Published on:

Lots of Canadians have been captivated by the Toronto Blue Jays playoff run into the World Series. A ball club which finished last in their division last year has made a historic turnaround which no fans or baseball pundits expected. They are the most mentally tough and resilient professional sports team I can remember.

One of the stories from the Toronto Blue Jays playoff run has been the injuries to the team, and their ability to cope with those injuries in order to compete at the highest level.

This got me thinking as a personal injury lawyer, and drawing comparisons to the injuries in the Toronto Blue Jays lineup and personal injury law. Specifically, dealing with long term disability cases.

When you think of long term disability, you have to think of it in binary or black and white terms. Either you are disabled, or you are not disabled. There is no middle ground or half way. For many people, this can present a major dilemma. The idea of going off work full time is daunting and scary. There is also no guarantee that the long term disability insurer will accept your claim. And if they do, there is no guarantee that your long term disability benefits won’t get cut off for one reason or another. It’s very scary to have to rely on your insurance company to make ends meet as unlike working, the payment of benefits is entirely outside of your control. You don’t know what the long term disability insurer is thinking; nor can y0u predict what they will do. What I recommend people do is expect the worst, but pray for the best.

The Toronto Blue Jays faced this predicament with a few of their players. You see, before a playoff series begins they have to announce their roster. There are limits on the number of players you can have on your roster. You want to have the right balance of starting pitchers, relievers, infielders, outfielders. Once the roster is set, you can’t go back and reset it, so that roster announcement is a very big strategic decision.

Continue reading →

Published on:

You will often hear personal injury lawyers refer to the term “tort“, or “tort case”, or “tort claim” or “tort law”. But what is a tort anyways? Here is a quick breakdown.

Torte: Noun: a yummy and rich, often multilayered cake that can be made with little to no flour, using ground nuts or bread crumbs insteadThese cakes are typically filled with ingredients like whipped cream, buttercream, jam, or fruit. Many traditional tortes, such as the Sachertorte and Linzer torte, have Austrian or German origins. Torte cakes are not legal terms. They are delicious deserts which make for wonderful housewarming presents. 

Torts: Person: John Tortorella akaTorts(born June 24, 1958) is an American professional ice hockey coach and former player. He most recently served as head coach for the Philadelphia Flyers of the National Hockey League (NHL). Tortorella has also been the head coach of the NHL’s New York RangersTampa Bay LightningVancouver Canucks and Columbus Blue Jackets. He led Tampa Bay to the 2004 Stanley Cup championship. I do not recommend bringing Tort with you into the Courtroom for a personal injury case. While I believe that he’s a great guy, and would make for a tenacious advocate, his expertise trends more towards hockey rather than personal injury litigation.

Tort: Noun: Legal: is a wrongful act other than a breach of contract for which relief may be obtained in the form of damages or an injunction. An act of injury or damage to a person or property that is covered by a law, so that the person can start a court action. Ontario car accident cases are divided into two cases: The Accident Benefit Part and the Tort Part. The Tort claim is the claim against the at fault driver who caused the accident in the first place. You will hear your personal injury lawyer describe this as the “Tort Claim” or the “Tort Case” or the “Tort Action“. Not to be confused with Torte (the delicious cake described above) or Torts, the Stanley Cup winning hockey coach described above. You can see how people can get confused!

Continue reading →

Published on:

I was watching the film All The President’s Men from 1976. It stars Robert Redford and Dustin Hoffman as Carl Bernstein and Paul Woodward (Woodward and Bernstein) as the two Wash Post journalists who broke the Watergate Scandal involving President Richard Nixon. I was watching the moving because Robert Redford passed away last month, and I wanted to watch (re-watch) some of his work.

So much was different with the 70’s. The attire. The hardwire rotary dial phones (with multiple lines in fancy offices). The fact that people picked up their phones. If people were away from their desks, there were no answering machines. You would leave a message with a receptionist, and she (back then it was always a she) would leave the person a note (almost always on yellow paper) to call the person back.

What amazed me of Woodward and Bernstein was how easily they were able to access information, and how few barriers there existed back then to obtaining background information in those days. There are many more privacy barriers when it comes to access to information today.

In one scene, they attend at a library in Washington and they’re able to see instantaneously the names telephone numbers, addresses and amounts of all donors tied to the Democratic Party to elect the next President. With that hot list of contacts in hand, they’re able to knock door to door, or make cold calls. People actually either answered the door, or answered the phones to speak with these guys. Getting this sort of personal information so easily is almost unheard of these days. Getting people to cooperate with you is just as rare.

Continue reading →

Published on:

Insurance companies love to hear when clients have “After The Event” insurance or “ATE” as it is known in the industry.

What is ATE?

At trial, a Judge can order that the losing party pay for the winning party’s legal costs. ATE is a policy of insurance meant to cover a Plaintiff if they lose at trial and they are ordered to pay the insurance company’s legal costs. This means that the Plaintiff would be covered up to the limits of the ATE policy. The amount of coverage depends on the policy itself. The better the policy, the more the Plaintiff would be covered should things go wrong after a loss at trial.

How are ATE Policies Sold?

ATE is an insurance policy which is generally sold to personal injury law firms to insure ALL of their personal injury clients; or clients with similar contingency fee arrangements. You won’t see ATE insurance for clients in non-litigation sorts of cases. ATE can be sold on individual policies, but generally, these are either hard to come by, or very expensive. The companies which sell ATE typically sell them to personal injury law firms to cover all of their files, some of their files; or more than 1 file. The business model is set up for bulk files and not individual files.

Can I take out my own individual ATE policy?

I have never seen an individual Plaintiff take out and pay for their own individual ATE policy, although I suspect that it’s entirely possible. I suspect that the answer to this is “no“, but it really depends on the appetite for risk of the insurance company. They would want the peace of mind knowing that there is a competent lawyer advancing the case rather than a self represented Plaintiff. But, anything can be sold at the right price if the insurer is flexible. I would imagine that the premiums for an individual policy without a lawyer would be very high to the point of prohibitive. But, if you told an insurer that a Plaintiff was willing to pay $500,000 for an ATE policy worth up to $200,000; I don’t think the insurer would be opposed to selling the policy knowing that they would be guaranteed to make $300,000 on the sale  of policy. Anything can be sold for the right price. Continue reading →

Published on:

I saw a YouTube Clip of a prominent American Trial Lawyer not long ago. It was very “us against them” in tone, but the messaging rang true.

For years, and in some cases, for decades, hard working people pay their hard earned after tax dollars to car insurers for premium payments. In Ontario, it’s illegal to drive a car without car insurance. So, paying your car premiums is the law; so you have to pay these premiums if you want to drive legaly.

More often than not, these payments are made to the same insurance company for years because studies show that people don’t often change insurance companies. That means you’re dealing with the same insurance company year, after year.

And year after year, nothing out of the ordinary will happen. You will pay your insurance premiums, and receive the occasional letter from your car insurer enclosing updated policy information and slips. But that’s pretty much it. You won’t ask a lot from your car insurer. And, in return, they won’t ask a lot from you aside from demanding the payment of premiums.

Car accidents and catastrophic events are the exception. They aren’t the rule. You can go your whole life without ever being involved in a serious car accident. And, let’s hope that’s the case because nobody wants to be involved in a car accident.

But, in the rare circumstance that you’ve been hurt or injured in a car accident; you would expect that the insurer who you have been dealing with for years to be there at your side in order to pay you the compensation which you deserve.

At the end of the day, you were in the wrong place, at the wrong time and have done nothing wrong. All that you are seeking is that you are compensated fairly for your losses, along with your pain and suffering.

But this is not how things work in personal injury cases. Instead of helping you out, the insurance company will use their immense resources to fight your claim every step of the way. They will pay experts, investigators and their lawyers thousands and thousands of dollars (if not more), to make sure that you aren’t compensated a single dime.

Continue reading →

Published on:

I was chatting with my 8 year old son not long ago about house prices.

He was curious as to why a small home in geographically desirable part of Toronto would sell for more than a much larger home in less desirable town with less amenities and less access to services.

We spoke about the golden rule of real estate: Location, Location, Location.

People will pay more money for a home with easy access to transit, postal services, entertainment, schools, potable water etc. Living off the grid might be desirable for some, but not most people, and is far more difficult than living on the grid.

There is a golden rule for personal injury law as well: Credibility, Credibility, Credibility.

If a Court doesn’t accept what a Plaintiff has to say about their case; then chances are that the Plaintiff won’t win.

The same can be said for a Defendant. If a Court doesn’t accept the Defendant’s evidence, then there is a very good chance that the Defendant will not be successful.

But, here is the hurdle for the Plaintiff.

The Defendant, in the vast majority of personal injury cases, will only be able to provide evidence as it relates to liability (how the accident happened). The Defendant will not be able to speak to the other major 2 elements of a personal injury case. The Defendant cannot provide evidence with respect to causation. Nor can a Defendant provide evidence as it relates to injuries or damages. Any by not being able to comment on these areas, the Defendant can win the case. It’s an example of less is more. The Defendant won’t be able to dig themselves into a hole by saying something which they shouldn’t say; or by rubbing a judge or jury the wrong way. The Defendant will stick to the information which they know as it relates to liability; and then; in the majority of cases won’t have anything left to say.

Continue reading →

Published on:

I have often seen a comparison between personal injury lawyers and real estate agents because of the way that they bill their clients.

Both realtors and personal injury lawyers take on files on a contingency fee basis. That means that they only get paid, unless there is an element of success (financial recovery) in the case. It has never made sense to me that personal injury lawyers and real estate agents are both paid on a contingency fee basis when the deals, the circumstances of the clients, and degree of difficult are so different when comparing the two industries.

Personal injury lawyers don’t need to take cases on a contingency fee basis. But, in the overwhelming majority of cases, we need to do so because our clients can’t afford to pay the high cost associated with modern day litigation. Even the most modest hourly rates are expensive. Even Court filing fees being charged by the Ministry of the Attorney General are expensive. The Court filing fee for a Statement of Claim is $243, which does not cover the cost of serving it which will tack on an extra few hundred dollars. The cost of filing a trial record with the Court is a staggering $859. On Court filing fees alone for a Statement of Claim and for filing a trial record, without taking into consideration any costs for a lawyer’s time, or the cost of a process server to get these documents served, an innocent accident victim has to pay to the Court a whopping $1,102! How on earth would a person who is too injured to work from their accident be able to afford that, let alone a lawyer’s time in preparing these documents or fighting the case on its merits.

Continue reading →

Published on:

Our law firms handles a lot of car accident cases from across Ontario. Each case is different. But, many car accident cases all carry common threads, and common themes.

At the most basic level, a car accident case will involve Defendant Driver causing a car crash involving a Plaintiff Driver. Defendant driver will have made some sort of mistake or misjudgment while driving which personal injury lawyers refer to as negligence. If the Plaintiff cannot establish negligence (or fault) on the part of the Defendant driver, then, the case will likely fail. In order to succeed in a personal injury case, the Plaintiff must establish some sort of tort against a Defendant. This is called a cause of action. If there is no cause of action (like negligence), then a Plaintiff cannot win his or her case.

Some injuries are really bad, or catastrophic as a direct result of a car accident. Some of the worst injuries which our personal injuries lawyers see are spinal cord injuries (or injuries to the back or lumbar spine). These injuries can leave an innocent accident victim paralyzed and requiring around the clock attendant care along with loads and loads of car costs which unfortunately might not be covered by OHIP.

Continue reading →

Published on:

Sometimes, the Toronto Injury Lawyer Blog writes about things other than personal injury law. This is one of those occasions.

Earlier this week, Pablo Torre launched a bombshell investigative report on his podcast, Pablo Torre Finds Out. It explores how the LA Clippers may have circumvented the NBA’s salary cap rules by paying their star player, former Toronto Raptor, Kawhi Leonard; through a no-show $28 million dollar endorsement contract.

It’s a must listen podcast for anyone who enjoys investigative journalism, business, basketball, and/or the Toronto Raptors. I, myself, love all of those things; so I listened to the podcast over, and over and over again.

Coincidentally, the podcast was released on Wednesday morning. That same morning I had to do all sorts of driving to meet with clients across Ontario; so I uploaded the podcast for my drive. It provided wonderful edutainment for my journey.

In listening to the podcast, I got really upset. You might be wondering why.

Continue reading →

Published on:

Goldfinger Injury Lawyers receives a lot of inquiries from people looking to advance personal injury cases arising from assaults.

An assault can take place in a variety of ways, in a variety of different places, between a variety of different people.

Think of it as a game of “Clue“. One day it can be Colonel Mustard, in the Conservatory, with the Candlestick. The next, it could be Professor Plumb, in the Ballroom, with the Lead Pipe. There are millions of different scenarios.

What does it mean to “win” one of these personal injury assault cases?

First, it’s important to make a distinction between a criminal case, and a personal injury case.

There is no compensation awarded to the assault victim in the criminal case. The assault victim is an innocent victim of a crime who stands to win nothing from the outcome of the criminal case. If the Crown is successful in proving that the accused broke the law, then the accused will be punished according to the law. This punishment can take form in many different ways. Normally, we see jail time, parole time, restrictions on gun ownership, restraining orders and/or payment of a fine to Court. The Judge can also order a payment of restitution, which is NOT an award for pain and suffering to the victim of the crime.

On the other hand, a personal injury case is all about compensation for the innocent victim of the assault (known as the Plaintiff). Therefore, “winning” a personal injury case for assault means that the Plaintiff is successful in having the Defendant pay them money for their pain, suffering and other damages compensable at law. This is what it means to “win” a personal injury case.

If a Plaintiff’s goal in the personal injury case is just to be an annoyance to the Defendant; then; there are other less expensive ways of doing that. But, if that is their goal, and if money is of no concern to them, then so be it. Lawsuits are a pain and a grand annoyance to deal with for everyday people who are not accustom to litigation. This is why wealthy people like to use lawyers.

Continue reading →

Contact Information