When we think of a dog attack, we tend to think that a dog bit another person. But this is not always the case. There are viable dog attack cases when a dog does not actually bite another person.
The dog owner is vicariously liable for the actions of his or her dog. This includes all aggressive behaviour which includes bitting, but includes all other forms of behaviour as well.
The Dog Owner’s Liability Act set forth clear language which does not limit liability to bitting alone:
Proceedings against owner of dog
4 (1) A proceeding may be commenced in the Ontario Court of Justice against an owner of a dog if it is alleged that,
(b) the dog has behaved in a manner that poses a menace to the safety of persons or domestic animals; or
(c) the owner did not exercise reasonable precautions to prevent the dog from,
(ii) behaving in a manner that poses a menace to the safety of persons or domestic animals. 2005, c. 2, s. 1 (6).
There is no mention in the language above which makes reference to bitting. Rather, the behaviour is described as “behaved in a manner that poses a menace to the safety of persons” or such that “the owner did not exercise reasonable precautions to prevent the dog from behaving in a manner that poses a menace to the safety of persons or domestic animals“. There is wide discretion for the Court to interpret this sort of behaviour which clearly will not be limited to bitting alone. It can be any other behaviour deemed to pose a menace to the safety of another person or domestic animal.